NOconsensus.org - Global warming info you deserve to hear.

Please buy my book (click)

Recent blog posts: Twitter

• The world wakes up to the World Wildlife Fund
• Why I won't be speaking at the Heartland conference
• Keeping the 'No Pressure' video alive
• The Environmental Defense Fund and the CIA
• The UN's environmental 'holocausts'
• Naked intolerance in the media
• Get 'em while they're young (WWF targets kids)
• Mother Mexico and the jackals
• David Suzuki's smoke & mirrors
• The WWF's soulless climate campaign

>> NEW TO MY BLOG? START HERE
>> RECOMMENDED READING
>> QUOTES OF THE WEEK
>> CLIMATE BIBLE GETS 21 Fs on REPORT CARD

blog posts sorted by theme below

The Delinquent Teenager is...one of the most important pieces of investigative journalism in recent years.

Matt Ridley, author of The Rational Optimist

click text for source

[icon credit]

NOconsensus.org original commentary (blog posts)

• The world wakes up to the World Wildlife Fund (May 7)
• Why I won't be speaking at the Heartland conference (May 5)
• Keeping the 'No Pressure' video alive (May 4)
• The Environmental Defense Fund and the CIA (May 3)
• The UN's environmental 'holocausts' (Apr 30)
• Naked intolerance in the media (Apr 26)
• Get 'em while they're young (WWF targets kids) (Apr 24)
• Mother Mexico and the jackals (Apr 21)
• David Suzuki's smoke & mirrors (Apr 18)
• The WWF's soulless climate campaign (Apr 15)
• Eco narcissists & their last chances (Apr 14)
• The WWF's vast pool of oil money (Apr 11)
• Disasters and the IPCC (Apr 10)
• Thank you, British taxpayers (Apr 3)
• Today's media: cheerleaders for the establishment (Apr 2)
• Earth Hour organizers prey on Mexico (Mar 29)
• The enormous CEO salaries behind Earth Hour (Mar 28)
• Earth Hour: corporations preaching morality (Mar 27)
• The wealthy corporations behind Earth Hour (Mar 26)
• The Royal Society's blatherfest (Mar 24)
• Canada's Senate, David Suzuki & The Delinquent Teen (Mar 21)
• Fairy tales on the road to Rio (Mar 19)
• Where is ground zero for climate change? (Mar 17)
• The authoritarian impulse and climate change (Mar 13)
• 17 days later, Peter Gleick is back in the saddle (Mar 9)
• UN climate chief's 'Green Crusader' award (Mar 8)
• Write a heretical essay, win £8,500 (Mar 5)
• Explosive Pachauri profile in Australian magazine (Mar 2)
• Where do Gleick's apologists draw the line? (Feb 28)
• Peter Gleick - then and now (Feb 24)
• Opinion disguised as science (Feb 22)
• Gleick speak (Feb 20)
• Big oil money for me, but not for thee (Feb 17)
• Closed minds at the IPCC (Feb 12)
• The Royal Society's joyride (Feb 10)
• Scientific consensus, leadership & Stephen Schneider (Feb 8)
• Bob Carter: a geological perspective (Feb 6 )
• Proselytizing to toddlers (Feb 3)
• Pachauri pushes emissions reduction - again (Feb 2)
• What Pachauri means by 'sustainable' (Jan 31)
• Pachauri's 5-star sustainability summit (Jan 30)
• Medical journals spearhead climate lynch mob (Jan 28)
• Green energy: the auditor isn't impressed (Jan 26)
• IPCC scientists - guests of the EDF (lobbyists) (Jan 21)
• The pipeline, the jobs & the media (Jan 20)
• Free speech is not negotiable: stop SOPA (Jan 18)
• The Canadian (climate) paradox (Jan 16)
• German-language news (Jan 14)
• Those who claim to speak for the future (Jan 12)
• Proud to be Canadian (Jan 10)
• What financial meltdowns teach us about the IPCC (Jan 5)
• Interviews (Jan 3)
• Pachauri: it's too late to fight climate change (Jan 1)
• The world's slowest learners (Dec 31)
• Munich Christmas market (photos) (Dec 24)
• Rajendra Pachauri: ever the activist (Dec 23)
• When the police knock on your door (Dec 21)
• The 'worst hit by climate change' contest (Dec 20)
• Which other minorities should be blasted into space? (Dec 17)
• Finally - real journalism on NGOs (Dec 14)
• Over-the-top climate rhetoric (Dec 13)
• 'Delinquent Teen' press clippings (Dec 12)
• When your paycheque depends on a climate crisis (Dec 8)
• Pachauri's green torch bearers (Dec 6)
• My own Josh cartoon (Dec 3)
• Inside the IPCC: the Climategate e-mails (Nov 23)
• Pachauri's rhetoric vs reality (Nov 22)
• Pachauri interviewed by pretend journalist (Nov 20)
• Pachauri: the little man who told big whoppers (Nov 19)
• News & reviews (Nov 14)
• The IPCC's fake review editor (Nov 9)
• A dark day in Australia (Nov 8)
• How to spot a delinquent teenager? (Nov 6)
• When the IPCC makes an error, is it the journo's fault? (Nov 4)
• Book sightings & an invite to Germany (Nov 3)
• WWF-affiliated personnel in Working Group 1 (Nov 2)
• UN climate warnings are so 1989 (Nov 1)
• A paperback is born (Oct 28)
• I'm interviewed about Peter Gleick & other matters (Oct 28)
• Paperback update (Oct 26)
• WWF Issues Press Release About My Book (Oct 24)
• National Post excerpt & review (Oct 21)
• Book review in an Arizona newspaper (Oct 20)
• You folks are fantastic! (Oct 19)
• Please review my book on Amazon (Oct 15)
• A book is born (Oct 13)
• WWF influence at the highest levels of the IPCC (Oct 4)
• 78 Names (Oct 1)
• Glaciergate's other WWF connection (Sept 29)
• Here an activist, there an activist (Sept 27)
• How the WWF infiltrated the IPCC (Part 2) (Sept 26)
• How the WWF infiltrated the IPCC (Sept 23)
• Solyndra solar scandal gains traction (Sept 14)
• Al Gore's money-grubbing (Sept 12)
• Of footnotes & factchecking (book update) (Sept 7)
• Moral leadership, climate change & the UN (Sept 5)
• The IAC report one year later (Sept 1)
• Comic book analysis from the leader of the IPCC (Aug 27)
• Pachauri's squishy timeline (Aug 26)
• The Journal of Climate & the IPCC (Aug 23)
• The backstory to the 'fleeing species' claim (Aug 21)
• Behind the aliens-will-smite-us news story (Aug 19)
• Why I won't be renewing my 'Economist' subscription (Aug 17)
• Comic relief (Aug 10)
• The Y2K scare, the media & climate change (Aug 9)
• Rajendra Pachauri: friend of the environment? (Aug 7)
• Naming names: experts tainted by activist cash (Aug 5)
• Pew, what's that smell? (Aug 4)
• Greenpeace's fear machine (Aug 2)
• Canadian scientists & the World Wildlife Fund (July 29)
• How the IPCC defines 'distinguished scientist' (July 27)
• Prof condemned for not teaching IPCC reports (July 25)
• Calling skeptics stupid doesn't convince anyone (July 23)
• Greenpeace disses 'covert calculations' (July 20)
• Al Gore's shameful new campaign (July 19)
• About my book (July 14)
• Looking for examples of the hockey stick graph (July 12)
• IPCC bigwigs spout political, childish nonsense (July 10)
• Chris Landsea and the Moral Midgets (July 7)
• Chris Landsea, the IPCC, & the UCS (July 5)
• Fanaticism 101 (July 2)
• The thrashing of Al Gore continues (June 29)
• Walter Russell Mead trashes Al Gore (June 26)
• The activists, the media, and the public (June 24)
• My fave chairman Pachauri quote (June 23)
• Pachauri's cause (June 21)
• Two population predictions (June 19)
• Oodles of cash (June 17)
• IPCC: These people haven't learned a thing (June 15)
• Science is not a tyrant (June 14)
• How much harm to humans is OK? (June 11)
• The IPCC as UN funding mechanism (June 8)
• Climate change & violent fantasies (June 6)
• David Suzuki is a drama queen (June 3)
• Peer-reviewed medical research critiqued (June 2)
• That wobbly foundation: peer-reviewed research (May 30)
• A story about a farmer, a flood & fish (May 28)
• Lord Turnbull trashes the IPCC (May 26)
• No harmony with hogweed (May 24)
• E-book tipping point (May 22)
• Swedish show trial (May 19)
• IPCC: screw the rules (May 17)
• The IPCC, the UK & Climate Censorship (May 16)
• Blindspots at the IPCC (May 13)
• The IPCC on renewable energy (May 10)
• The Climate Caper (book review) (May 9)
• Slivers of the Nobel pie (May 6)
• Fixed: the IPCC's climate model evaluation game (May 3)
• The case of Michael Oppenheimer (May 1)
• Three cheers for new tech (Apr 30)
• When the lights go out (Apr 29)
• WWF's chief spokesperson joins IPCC (Apr 25)
• Ka-ching! More Greenpeace money (Apr 22)
• Clueless new IPCC policy ignores advocacy literature (Apr 21)
• Speeding tickets and the IPCC (Apr 19)
• Citizen audit anniversary (Apr 17)
• The missing map (Apr 16)
• A view from Portugal (Apr 15)
• Hansen, Suzuki & Greenpeace (Apr 12)
• Foul play on Facebook (Apr 10)
• The state of the IPCC's leadership (Apr 9)
• Pachauri's pal - the Worldwatch Institute (Apr 7)
• The IPCC's activist chairman (Apr 5)
• The IPCC's pretend neutrality (Apr 4)
• Responses to the Japanese earthquake (Apr 2)
• Politically incorrect prof may lose his job (Apr 1 2011)

• Why is humanity always the fall guy? (Mar 31)
• The horse manure problem (Mar 29)
• Message from Australia (Mar 27)
• The IPCC insider's club (Mar 25)
• Earth Hour? I'll take a 'no nagging' hour (Mar 23)
• Our man at the IPCC (Mar 22)
• The missing questionnaires (Mar 21)
• The IPCC mythology (direct quotes) (Mar 20)
• Earth to scientists (Mar 18)
• The strange case of Sari Kovats (Mar 16)
• Peer into the heart of the IPCC, find Greenpeace (Mar 14)
• Was the fix in before the IPCC existed? (Mar 13)
• Dr Nadelhoffer, I’m not impressed (Mar 11)
• The EPA and the Canadian climate modeler (Mar 10)
• Fiddling while infants perish (Mar 8)
• Green math: let's spend $1 B to save $8 million (Mar 7)
• The WWF vice president & the new IPCC report (Mar 4)
• Are University of London PhDs confidential? (Mar 3)
• Scientists speak out (Mar 2)
• Not your grandfather's Greenpeace (Mar 1 2011)

• Environmentalism runs amok (Feb 27)
• You doubt monger, you (Feb 25)
• Flying cars and sewing machines (Feb 24)
• The never-policy-prescriptive Pachauri (Feb 23)
• Bill McKibben says it's urgent (Feb 21)
• Scientists have allowed themselves to be used (Feb 19)
• Friday giggles (Feb 18)
• Andrew Weaver vs Tim Flannery (Feb 16)
• An IPCC history lesson (Feb 15)
• It isn't a conspiracy: only money, fashion & power (Feb 14)
• How do you say 'independent' in Australian? (Feb 13)
• Bill McKibben's bad example (Feb 11)
• Michael Crichton's legacy (Feb 10)
• John Holdren's IPCC myths (Feb 9)
• Is everything really getting worse? (Feb 8)
• Climategate 2.0 (Feb 7)
• How does the IPCC safeguard against bias? (Feb 5)
• NASA, climate change, and children (Feb 4)
• Want kids to learn science? (Feb 3)
• What they said about the climate models (Feb 2)
• Teachers: the new green police (Feb 1, 2011)

• Does the IPCC follow the rules? Insiders say 'No' (Jan 31)
• Credit where it's due (Jan 29)
• Mr. Chairman, your carriage awaits (Jan 28)
• If IPCC meetings were televised (Jan 27)
• The sneaky, not-so-secret purpose of the IPCC (Jan 26)
• All for a Nobel cause (Jan 24)
• Perceptions of Pachauri (Jan 22)
• Grey literature: IPCC insiders speak candidly (Jan 21)
• IPCC Nobel laureates lack scientific credibility (Jan 20)
• The uses and abuses of a Nobel Prize (Jan 19)
• The sad state of the debate (Jan 17)
• Is the IPCC a scrutiny-free zone? (Jan 16)
• The silent treatment (Jan 14)
• Is a meteorologist a drought expert? (Jan 13)
• Science website publishes WWF press releases (Jan 12)
• Flooding in Australia (Jan 11)
• IPCC errors: in the eye of the beholder (Jan 10)
• New blog examines green history (Jan 9)
• Does global warming look like Australia? (Jan 7)
• Greenpeace: corporate stocks and Noah's arks (Jan 5)
• If you don't believe in AGW, the terrorists win (Jan 3)
• Last call (Jan 2)
• Celebrating science (Jan 1, 2011)

• Merci beaucoup (Dec 31, 2010)
• World Wildlife Fund infiltrates UK government (Dec 30)
• Best of 2010 at NoFrakkingConsensus (Dec 28)
• Future babble (Dec 27)
• Have a little faith (Dec 25)
• Season's greetings - via Maggie's blog (Dec 24)
• Blood supply threatened by green extremism (Dec 23)
• 232 opinions concerning the IPCC (Dec 21)
• Baby, it's cold outside (Dec 19)
• The climate's gonna kill us (circa 1974) (Dec 17)
• The IPCC's 12 days of Christmas (Dec 16)
• Missing documents, unfulfilled promises (Dec 15)
• Forty years of drama queen scientists (Dec 13)
• If the science is so persuasive, why the theatrics? (Dec 11)
• The UN's grim fantasy: one-child laws (Dec 9 )
• A powerful new research tool (Dec 7)
• Why people think public transit sucks (Dec 7)
• New York Times reporter spanks the UN (Dec 5)
• Speaking of holiday cheer... (Dec 4)
• Why I'm giving 'The Hockey Stick Illusion' for Xmas (Dec 3)
• World War II rationing - the 'hated sacrifice' (Dec 1)

• Kevin Anderson: the ration card man (Nov 30)
• The Royal Society's big oil award (Nov 29)
• Why good judgment matters (Nov 28)
• Appalling rhetoric from a climate skeptic (Nov 26)
• Greenpeace's 12th century technology (Nov 24)
• The non-stop disaster narrative (2-minute video) (Nov 22)
• UN style empirical research (Nov 20)
• Should UN employees be IPCC lead authors? (Nov 18)
• Suzuki's Children (The Political Kind) (Nov 16)
• Monkeys could do this (Nov 14)
• Splattergate - six weeks later (Nov 12)
• Lest we forget the importance of liberty (Nov 11)
• Margaret Atwood should resign from PEN Int'l (Nov 10)
• Slaying the unicorn (Nov 8)
• When is a job offer not a job offer? (Part 2) (Nov 6 )
• When is a job offer not a job offer? (Part 1) (Nov 5)
• Still clueless in Australia (Nov 4)
• Wind and solar in fantasy land (Nov 2)
• Wind power's double standard (Nov 1, 2010)

• Halloween's eco monsters (Oct 30)
• Message to young journalists: connect the dots (Oct 29)
• Speech crimes & ethics 101 (Oct 28)
• Glimpses of Delingpole (photos) (Oct 27)
• The media messes up (Oct 26)
• Local government is not about being green (Oct 25)
• An even younger senior author (Oct 22)
• Meet the IPCC's youngest lead author (Oct 21)
• More grad student expertise (Oct 20)
• Lead author lacked a Master's degree (Oct 19)
• The non-stop IPCC spin machine (Oct 18)
• Rub asbestos on your face, why don't cha (Oct 15)
• The IPCC's confused chairman (Oct 14)
• David Suzuki's five kids (Oct 13)
• Transformational Canadians (Oct 11)
• Extinction fiction (Oct 9)
• Another IPCC train wreck: species extinction (Part 2) (Oct 7)
• Greenpeace and the violent video (Oct 5)
• Another IPCC train wreck: species extinction (Part 1) (Oct 4)
• If we are not free to disagree, we are not free (Oct 1, 2010)

• Blood & gore against global warming (Sept 30)
• David Suzuki's odd view of women (Sept 27)
• The politics of fear (Sept 24)
• Can we recycle Bono? (Sept 22)
• Seven (real) questions for David Suzuki (Sept 20)
• Anti-science claim is devoid of meaning (Sept 17)
• The shoddy Climategate inquiries (Sept 14)
• Politicians dressed in lab coats (Sept 12)
• The new graduate who served as IPCC lead author (Sept 9)
• Are humans parasites? (Sept 7)
• The book the IPCC plagiarized (Sept 3)
• [IPCC chairman] Pachauri defrocked (Sept 1 )
• Conflict-of-interest at the IPCC (Aug 30 )
• Extreme nonsense (Aug 27 )
• IPCC author profile: Alistair Woodward (Aug 25, 2010)

• See you in mid-August - IPCC related links (July 5 )
• 1969 climate predictions miss by a mile (July 3)
• IPCC says climate prediction impossible (June 30 )
• The legal disclaimers behind the climate science (June 28 )
• The story that should be on the front page (June 26)
• Who is William R.L. Anderegg? (June 24 )
• Climate bible's new authors announced (June 23 )
• Climate skeptics photo essay - Part 2 (June 22 )
• Scientists & science journalists - please grow up (June 18 )
• The activists, the poll & the data (June 15 )
• Cross-examining the IPCC (June 13 )
• How many IPCC scientists say so? (June 11 )
• Climate skeptics photo essay - Part 1 (June 7 )
• BP, Greenpeace & the big oil jackpot (June 4)
• The media, Mother Nature and oil spills (June 1, 2010)

• James [Delingpole] the Irreverent (May 30)
• Forget genocide & malnutrition - Sudan leads IPCC (May 26)
• We trusted too completely (May 24)
• More IPCC mischief (May 21)
• Intellectual freedom (May 20)
• Skeptics' conference - first photos (May 16)
• IPCC cites an unpublished journal 39 times (May 13)
• Cutoff dates, what cutoff dates? (May 10)
• Citizen Audit report is now a PDF (May 9)
• Shielding climate orthodoxy from free speech (May 5)
• IPCC snowed by snowmobile lobby (May 3)
• Press release masquerade - Part 2 (Apr 30 )
• IPCC falls for press release masquerade (Apr 28)
• What the IPCC learned from press releases (Apr 26, 2010)

• The Stern Review scandal (Apr 24)
• Earth Day and the media (Apr 22)
• Dr. Pachauri, call your office (Apr 21 )
• A seasoned veteran's view of the IPCC (Apr 19)
• IPCC reliance on grey lit 30 times UK threshold (Apr 18 )
• What's left if we disregard non-peer-reviewed claims? (Apr 16)
• The water cannon of the climate debate (Apr 15)
• Climate bible gets 21 'F's on report card (Apr 14)
• Poll: how many non-peer-reviewed references? (Apr 10)
• Money to burn (Mar 31)
• Earth Hour 2010 (Mar 26)
• Does the IPCC prefer grey literature to peer-reviewed? (Mar 23)
• The auditor - a cartoon by Josh (Mar 16)
• Who's concerned about the climate report? (Mar 11)
• Help audit the UN climate report: crowdsourcing project (Mar 8)
• The great peer-review fairy tale (Mar 6)
• Almost half non-peer-reviewed (Mar 4)
• The battle for the soul of science (Mar 2, 2010)

• Al Gore blows tobacco smoke in our face - again (Feb 28)
• Let there be no more scientific consensuses (Feb 26)
• Reuters' climate change fiction (Feb 24)
• Independent bloggers vs corporate environmentalists (Feb 22)
• Newsflash: snowless in Vancouver is perfectly normal (Feb 20)
• Is this politics or science? (Feb 19)
• The climate bible and the home inspector (Feb 17)
• The cult of the expert (Feb 16)
• A bogus 21-year-old climate prediction (Feb 15)
• Valentine's Day and the scientific method (Feb 14)
• Scientists' opinions are sometimes irrelevant (Feb 12)
• Just one cotton-pickin' minute: a newspaper's U-turn (Feb 11)
• James Hansen drags NASA into his personal politics (Feb 9)
• Audi's 'Green Police' Superbowl ad (Feb 8, 2010)

• Systemic failure: invasion of the drama queens (Feb 6)
• Yes Virginia, the climate bible relies on news clippings (Feb 3)
• What she said about the climate bible 3 months ago (Feb 2)
• Weekend roundup: climate boss Pachauri (Feb 1)
• We're always out-of-touch with the future (Feb 1)
• Greenpeace and the Nobel-winning climate report (Jan 28)
• NASA's mistaken glacier info (Jan 25)
• More dodgy citations in the Nobel-winning IPCC report (Jan 23)
• Time magazine's controversial glacier expert (Jan 21)
• Silly earthquake commentary (Jan 16)
• Green time capsule: 1970 eco ideas weren't pretty (Jan 15)
• The big picture: the Y2K lesson (Jan 13)
• Climate skepticism is free speech (Jan 11)
• Climate psychics: 10-yr snow prediction fails miserably (Jan 7)
• If we don't agree, you're crazy (Jan 5)
• Al Gore's tobacco hypocrisy (Jan 1, 2010)

• Global disaster is so 1976 (Dec 20)
• Science says: hop on one foot (Dec 19)
• Bill McKibben: extravagant emotional excess (Dec 15)
• ClimateGate links (an intro to the controversy) (Dec 14)
• Copenhagen banner says: scrap capitalism (Dec 13)
• Al Gore: not this thinking woman's thinking man (Dec 12)
• Our hyperactive planet (Dec 8)
• We have heard this rhetoric before (Dec 8)
• Why the Munk Debate proves the debate isn't over (Dec 2)
• Is corporate e-mail private e-mail? (Nov 22)
• Scientific organizations - should we trust them? (Nov 17)
• Bullies need not apply (Nov 13)
• Climate Confusion & The End of Nature (book review) (Nov 12)
• Canada's tar sands and cancer rates (Nov 9)
• Political idealogues are bad for the environment (Oct 24)
• Bias: How the Media Distort the News (book notes) (Oct 23)
• On saying the debate is over (2-min video & script) (Oct 13 2009)

• The Honest Broker (book notes) (Sept 27)
• An Appeal to Reason (book notes) (Sept 26)
• The age of regret (Sept 21)
• Predicting the future: zero visibility possible (Sept 15)
• Did IQs drop sharply? (Aug 26)
• How much is a bird's life worth? (oil vs wind turbines) (Aug 21)
• Aerospace pioneer dismisses global warming (Aug 19)
• Comic George Carlin on saving the planet (Aug 19)
• This is not fair play (2-min video & script) (Aug 6)
• Global warming and My Cousin Vinny (Aug 4)
• Al Gore thinks your brain is too primitive (July 18)
• Global temperatures are not our plaything (July 15)
• James Hansen and the experts (July 6)
• Do as I say, not as I do (greens reject consensus) (July 2, 2009)

• Slurs, smears & money (June 19)
• Common ground between skeptics & believers (June 12)
• Hysteria from the skeptical side of the fence (Part 2) (May 22)
• Hysteria from the skeptical side of the fence (Part 1) (May 21)
• On the cusp (May 16)
• Change happens (Apr 24)
• Good girl, bad girl (Apr 15)
• the beginning: That's it, I've had it (Apr 1)
• prologue:The Economist hits an iceburg (Jan 10, 2009)

•IPCC report card (citizen audit findings)

•2-minute videos by NOconsensus
#1: This Is Not Fair Play
#2: On Saying the Debate is Over
#3: The Non-Stop Disaster Narrative

• NOconsensus on Facebook
• NOconsensus on Twitter

• parody:DeSoggyBog.com

Photos from a 2010 climate skeptics' conference (Chicago)
[click inside photos to enlarge]

for blog posts on these topics, please click

• ACTIVIST SCIENTISTS
• The CLIMATE BIBLE
• ETHICAL & PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES
• FREE SPEECH
• HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
• The MEDIA: BETRAYING THE PUBLIC TRUST
• MONEY & FUNDING
• NG0s
• PREDICTIONS THAT FAILED